Forum Shows Ramifications Following Delphi, Civic Center Decision
Council could put end to location discussion Feb. 7.
Top Oak Creek officials tried once again Monday night to convince Oak Creek aldermen, school board members and an audience of about 70 community members that the city should move the library and city hall to the former Delphi site, 7929 S. Howell Ave.
The comments came at a public forum Monday night to discuss the options and implications of the decision on where the two facilities should be located.
The issue could finally come to a head Feb. 7, when the Common Council is scheduled to take up the matter during its regularly-scheduled meeting. Officials say a public hearing will be held before a vote is taken.
Not so simple
A move to the Delphi site is complicated, and involves two land swaps that would go like this:
- The city exchanges the 12-acre Civic Center site at the corner of Puetz Road and Howell Avenue - where the library, city hall, community center and Fire Station 1 now sit - with the Oak Creek-Franklin School District for 50 acres near the corner of Howell and Oakwood Road. The Civic Center site could then potentially be used for a future expansion of Oak Creek High School.
- The city then exchanges those 50 acres with Wispark, the developer and owner of the Delphi property, for seven acres at the Delphi site to build the city hall and library. The city would also get $725,000 from Wispark to make up the difference in value between the Oakwood and Delphi properties. That was previously negotiated with Wispark.
City officials including Mayor Al Foeckler and City Administrator Gerald Peterson painted that option as the most financially-beneficial for Oak Creek and the one that will lead to the best development at Delphi.
They argued the Delphi site will have a higher value and be a better draw with those buildings on it; that building at the Delphi site is cheaper; and opening up the Oakwood property to private development would lead to more jobs and an increase in the tax base.
Other options in play
However, not everyone agrees that civic components are necessary for a successful Delphi redevelopment project, or that it's as financially rosy as presented.
If not that, the other options on the table are keeping city hall and the library where they are, or moving only the library to Delphi.
If the buildings are kept at the Civic Center, land ownership stays status quo and the city gets a $125,000 return by selling the seven acres at Delphi, according to the presentation.
If only one is moved, the school district could decide to whether to keep or exchange the Oakwood property for the Civic Center site.
No matter the option, Peterson said costs will be paid largely through We Energies-related money - the company is contractually obligated to invest $20 million in Oak Creek, and the city also receives $3.3 million per year in public utility aid - and a tax-incremental financing district. A TIF allows a developer or municipality to borrow money and repay the loan through the increased property taxes.
"No new taxes are necessary for these projects," Peterson said.
The entire presentation and financial estimates can be found on the city's website.
School impacts
The nearly two-and-a-half hour forum on Monday, held at Oak Creek High School, brought together the Common Council and School Board under one roof.
Oak Creek-Franklin school officials have said they are open to the possibility of swapping the Oakwood property for the Civic Center site, but have not made any official declarations.
School Board member Brian Kaminski said at the forum that the city's preferred option, in which the school district would receive the Civic Center site, is the one that would be the "most workable" for the school district.
But another School Board member, Mark Verhalen, who is also running for mayor, disagreed and added the board and district have not come to a definitive decision. Verhalen also criticized city officials for "misleading" the public at the forum by presenting "half truths" - particularly with estimates on construction costs and tax base impacts - in an attempt to move that option forward.
Reaction
Other reaction to the proposals was mixed. Some voiced support for a better library, some called for the question to be put to referendum and others wondered about the long-term ramifications on the high school.
"I do really like the library system. I would like to see it grow greatly because it is rather lacking," resident Mary Turner said. "But I would like to keep it close to the schools. At that Delphi location, it seems a little difficult for children to get there."
Oak Creek resident Melissa Hakes said the Civic Center site won't be big enough for a high school expansion. While it's 12 acres total, five of those acres are used by the community center, which is not moving.
"As I got to experience high school for the first time with my freshman this year, I can already tell you that we're going to be out of space," she said. "It's already overcrowded. You're going to have to do something, and you're not going to be able to do it on seven acres. I highly recommend that you keep your 50 acres (at Oakwood)."
Stay up to date and learn more about the Delphi redevelopment project at Oak Creek Patch's Delphi page.
vocal local 1
12:10 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Public Utility Aide to OC is 1.4 Mil per year per unit or 2.8 Mil, of this one million goes to the Capital Improvements for street and bridge projects. Thus, only 1.8 million is available for debt payment. NOT 3.3 million. Further, if the Delphi "deal" does not go forward the General Fund becomes unstable without the one million dollar payment from Wis Park listed as revenue i-n this years budget. Without any new construction of either the library or city hall the city will be roughly 23.5 million in debt by the end of 2012. Police station 6 mil, streets, 7 mil, Drexel Ave. 10.5 mi. In addition both Puetz (2.5 mil) and Pennsylvania Ave. (4 mil) reconstruction projects have been placed on hold another 6.5 mil or 30 mil debt. In addition we have two bridges that require repair or roads will be closed as traffic is detoured around unsafe bridges.Also of concern is the fact that one unit is down which decreases Public Utility aide if not brought back on line this year to 1.4 Mil. FUNDING SOURCE IS UNSTABLE, and we lose our AAA bond rating.
What is also misleading it the 20 mil Wis Park promised to invest in the city of OC per the 2003 mitigation agreement. 16 million has aready been invested. Folks remember this is not a grant, this is a loan. Council did pay Wis Park back nearly a million Wis Park had invested in Carrollville. Lakefront development will no longer be financed per the 2003 or twenty million dollar investment agreement. Thus Lakefront development is dead.
Concerned Citizen
5:41 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
The School Board trades 7 acres of land for 50. The taxpayers paid for the land and the public school officials give it away. They don't have any idea what they are doing and it shows. Time to get a new board member and administration. The Administration wasn't even at the meeting.
Jenny
7:41 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Having the Common Council and the School Board together was a great step forward for Oak Creek. It's nice to see everyone taking into account the other's needs. I am very excited about this realistic future project and how it will benefit the families of Oak Creek thru a new library, new restaurants, new businesses (= new jobs), convenient shopping (tax revenue for the city...yay!) and most of all a bigger high school. I tell my children that they need to plan for and invest in their future. I love that Oak Creek is doing just that.
Cassie Donahoe
9:11 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Jenny-I love your take on this! I agree, this meeting should be seen as a positive step for Oak Creek. It's such an exciting time for the community and I look forward to watching Oak Creek grow!
Jeff
9:23 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Another big question no one asked: Why is the city afraid to postpone any vote on this until after the April elections?
It is only an additional 2-3 month wait and by doing so, we will have an Oak Creek citizens ELECTED mayor, not a 6 person council APPOINTED mayor.
Bob
11:22 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Right on Jeff. To have the future of Oak Creek possibly decided by a lame duck appointed Mayor is cause for outrage.
The meeting on Monday brought out one very important point. The City needs the Schools 50 acres more than the School needs the Citys 7 acres. This puts the School Board in a favorable bargaining position.
Forget the locked in price they have to sell to the city, anything can be changed.
Get some land for a new elementary school included. Let the Schools come out on top for a change.
The School Board has a golden opportunity here. Don't blow it.
Michael
11:53 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
REFERENDUM!
CHANGE. ORG
CREATE THIS AND CIRCULATE IT IF YOU ARE SERIOUS ABOUT HAVING YOUR VOICE BE HEARD, YOU WILL SIGN AND ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO THE SAME
Lindenwood
8:12 am on Monday, March 5, 2012
When was the last time you were in a library? Most of the people that do go there use the free computers instead! Why wouild anyone waste money of this project? How about an enclosed community swimming pool facility instead? That would be used year round and have the benefit of teaching young people a life-saving benefit!