patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Political Insiders Feeling Good About Their Candidates

In final Patch survey of influencers, Republicans predict a close race in Wisconsin, while Democrats seem sure of Obama’s victory here.

 

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Patch’s final survey of Wisconsin political insiders reveals that party influencers believe the presidential candidates they support will previal in Wisconsin and nationwide in Tuesday's election.

However, Democrats insiders seem a bit more confident that President Barack Obama will take Wisconsin, while Republicans are projecting a close race with Mitt Romney ultimately winning, with many saying polls that show Obama in the lead will be proven wrong.

As it has throughout the campaign, Patch sent its "Blue Wisconsin" and "Red Wisconsin" surveys to more than 150 activists and insiders of both parties, and 60 and 40 Democrats participated in this survey.

Most Republican insiders — 70 percent — predicted that Romney will win Wisconsin. Fifteen percent of GOP respondents said Obama would win Tuesday. When it comes to who will win the election, 88 percent picked Romney.

“For the first time in history, the conservative base is organized, not merely motivated. I expect similar returns and turnout as 2008, but in Romney’s favor this time,” wrote one Republican insider.

Republicans call for a close race here

Republican respondents predict a close race in Wisconsin, with one-third saying Romney will carry Wisconsin by less than 3 percentage points and 13 percent saying the race was too close to call. Twenty-eight percent of those surveyed said Romney will win Wisconsin by 3 to 5 percentage points, while 10 percent believe he'll take the state by more than 5 points.

Nine Republicans, or 15 percent, said they think Obama will win Wisconsin and three people, or 5 percent, think he will win the national popular vote.

Poll predictions doubted

Republican insiders said they were skeptical of recent polls that show Obama in the lead, saying that Republican energy and turnout for the election is being underestimated, nationally and Wisconsin. Of 21 polls taken in Wisconsin since September, Obama has led in 19 of them, while two have shown the two candidates tied.

In Wisconsin, because of their success in the recall election, “Republicans will be out in droves – they are motivated and they smell success,” wrote one Republican respondent.

“The Republicans will win larger percentages than the talking heads are forecasting. This is because the Republicans are much more enthusiastic than the Democrats,” another insider said.

Democrats convinced of Obama’s success

Democratic respondents are a bit more confident their candidate will prevail in Wisconsin, according to Patch's survey results.

Among Democrats, 95 percent said they think Obama will win Wisconsin and only two, or 5 percent, said the race was too close to call.

The majority of Democrats, 78 percent,  responded that they thought Obama would win Wisconsin by 3 or more percentage points, and 18 percent seeing Obama winning by 5 points or more.

“In every presidential election since the landslide of 1984, Wisconsin has voted Democratic and this year shall be no different,” wrote one Democrat.

For the national popular vote, Democrats aren’t as certain.

Although 92 percent predict Obama will win the national popular vote, they predict a closer race: 37 percent, predict that Obama will win the national popular vote by less than 3 percentage points, while 53 percent think Obama will win by 3 or more points.

Other survey results also broke down along party lines:

  • 93 percent of Democrats said Obama had the better "ground game" during the campaign, while 93 percent of Republicans said it was Romney.
  • 73 percent of Democrats said Obama had run a better advertising campaign, while 60 percent of Republicans said the same of Romney.
  • When asked what was most key to winning Wisconsin, 70 of Democrats said it was turning out the Democratic base; 30 percent said it was convicting undecided voters to vote for Obama.
  • When Republicans were asked the same question, 60 percent turning out the GOP base was most important, and 40 percent said convincing undecideds to vote for Romney.

Tammy vs. Tommy

The Patch survey also asked the insiders about the close U.S. Senate race between U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin and former Gov. Tommy Thompson.

Among Democrats, 88 percent predicted Baldwin would win, with 12 percent saying the race was too close to call. The results were almost identical on the other side, witih 87 percent of Republicans saying Thompson would take the race, and 10 pecent saying it was too close to call. Three percent (two people) predicted a Baldwin victory.

Eighty percent of the Democrats surveyed said the turnout in the presidential race will result in more votes for Baldwin, while 42 percent said it would benefit Thompson.

Some common ground

Despite their differences, Patch’s political insiders may have found common ground on two points about this election.

Respondents on both sides of the aisle predict a delay in finding out definitive results for the election.

“Odds are that we still won’t know who the president will be on Wednesday morning,” wrote one Republican polled.

“Likely we won’t know the final presidential results for some time,” wrote a Democratic respondent.

Also, whatever political differences divide them, Republican and Democrats alike are looking forward to the end of an end to what they called an exhausting and negative election cycle.

“I’ll be glad when it’s over. I’m exhausted,” wrote one respondent.

“Hallelujah and pass the gin! I’ve lived through another one,” wrote another.


Patch's Red Wisconsin Survey participants are:

Jim  Bender, president of School Choice Wisconsin, former chief of staff for Assembly Republican Leader Jeff Fitzgerald; Bill Berdan, first vice chairman, Wauwatosa Republicans; Keith  Best, public relations chairman for Waukesha County Republicans;  Bob Bradley, party activist; Charles Brey, field director for state Assembly candidate Tracy Herron; Tracy Brodd, Republican campaign worker; Paul  Bucher, former Waukesha County district attorney and candidate for Wisconsin attorney general; Roy Catron, Tea Party activist; Andrew Cegielski, former Milwaukee County Board candidate; Sara Conrad, party activist; Bill Cosh, spokesman for the state Department of Natural Resources; Michael Crowley, Waukesha County supervisor; Jake Curtis, former state Assembly candidate; Lou D'Abbraccio, board member, Racine County Republican Party;  Brian Dey, Racine County Tea Party member; Fred Dooley, conservative blogger; Steven Duckhorn, former Republican candidate for Milwaukee County sheriff; Bill Folk, chairman of Racine County Republican Party;Elisabeth Friesen, Republican activist; Jesse Garza, chairman, St. Croix County Republican Party; Mark Green, senior director of the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition, former U.S. ambassador to Tanzania and former congressman; Chris Haines, longtime campaign volunteer and former GOP campaign manager; Deb Hawley Jordahl, conservative strategist and consultant; John Hiller, co-chair of Scott Walker's transition team as governor; Sandra Hollander,  member of Mitt Romney's  “Juntos con Romney” leadership team; Ethan Hollenberger, former chairman of the College Republicans at Marquette University and staff member on several legislative campaigns; Mark Honadel, state reprsentative, 21st District; Marguerite Ingold, party activist; Valerie Johnson, former GOP fundraiser and staffer for various campaigns; Thomas J. Keeley, political consultant; Scott Kelly, communications director for former state Sen. Van Wanggaard; Cindy Kilkenny, conservative blogger; Rik Kluessendorf, attorney and former state Assembly candidate; Dan Knodl, state representative, 24th District; Tif Koehler, campaign volunteer and civic leader; Johnny Koremenos, regional field director for Tommy Thompson campaign; Gordon Lang, member of North Shore Republicans; Chris Larsen, trustee in Village of Sturtevant Trustee; Noelle Lorraine, field coordinator for Americans for Prosperity; John P. Macy, first vice chairman of Waukesha County Republican Party; Kathleen Madden, Waukesha County Clerk of Circuit Court; Ginny Marschman, party activist; Jessica McBride, conservative columnist; Bill McCoshen political consultant and; former cabinet secretary for Gov. Tommy Thompson; Joe Medina, party activist; Randy Melchert, field director for Mark Neumann's campaign; Gerald Mellone, Brookfield alderman; Ryan Morgan, conservative blogger; Dean Munday, conservative blogger; Mark Neumann, U.S. Senate candidate and former congressman; Kelly O'Brien, founder of Shorewood Citizens for Responsible Government; Eric Wm. Olsen, conservative activist; Nick Oliver, state Assembly candidate, 22nd District; Victoria Ostry, treasurer of the Wisconsin Federation of Republican Women.; Rick Owen, Brookfield alderman; Monnine  Parnitzke, party activist; Steve Ponto, mayor of Brookfield; Don Pridemore, state representative, 99th District; Paris Procopis, grassroots activist; Jim  Pugh, director of public relations and issue management for Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce; Denise Rate, Tea Party member; Bob Reddin, Brookfield alderman and executive director, Jobs First Coalition; Pam Reeves, treasurer, Waukesha County Republicans;  Joe Rice, former county supervisor and member of North Shore Republicans Executive Committee; Nate Ristow, candidate for 13th District State Assembly; Brandon Rosner, Wisconsin Republican consultant;  Bill Savage, aide to state Rep. Don Pridemore and  officer of Menomonee Falls Taxpayers Association; Jim  Schaefer, Muskego-Norway School Board president; Josh Schimek, conservative blogger; JB Schmidt, conservative blogger; Christian Schneider, senior fellow at Wisconsin Policy Research Institute and former policy analyst for Wisconsin State Legislature; Ashley Schultz, state director of the Recall Action Fund;  Nick Schweitzer, Libertarian pundit and blogger; Tim Schwister, former State Assembly candidate; Dan Sebring, vice chairman, Milwaukee County Republicans and candidate for 4th Congressional District; Cathy Stepp, Wisconsin Natural Resources secretary and former state senator; Jeff Stone, state representative, 82nd District; Jonathan Strasburg, attorney; Dave  Swarthout, board member, 1st Congressional District Republicans; Charles Sykes, conservative talk show host for WTMJ Radio;  Steve Taylor, Milwaukee County supervisor; Jenny Toftness, executive director of the Republican Assembly Campaign Committee; Greg Torres, Jefferson County supervisor; Jim  Villa, former chief of staff to County Executive Scott Walker and Alberta Darling; current CEO of Commercial Association of REALTORS® Wisconsin; Robin Vos, state representative; 63rd District; Dan Vrakas, Waukesha County Executive; Yash Wadhwa, former State Assembly candidate; Jeff Wagner, conservative talk show host, WTMJ Radio; Tom Weatherston, candidate for 62nd Assembly District and Village of Caledonia trustee; Steve Welcenbach, head of the Menomonee Falls Taxpayers Association and Tea Party activist; Todd Welch, Wisconsin state coordinator at Campaign for Liberty; James Wigderson, conservative blogger and columnist for Waukesha Freeman; Eddie Willing, conservative columnist in Racine County and executive director ofFoundersIntent.org; Chris Wright, Sturtevant village trustee and former candidate for State Assembly; Phil Ziegler, CEO of InPro Inc. and party activist.

 


Patch's Blue Wisconsin Survey participants are:

Kelley Albrecht, candidate for 63rd State Assembly District; Mandela Barnes, candidate for 11th State Assembly District; Ron Biendseil, vice chair for membership, Dane County Democratic Party; Tammy Bockhorst, membership secretary/membership chair, Milwaukee County Democratic Party; Randy Bryce, candidate for 62nd State Assembly District; Brian Carlson, liberal blogger; Sachin Chheda, chair, Milwaukee County Democratic Party; Jeff Christensen, chair, 5th Congressional District Democrats; Mark Conforti, chief negotiator for the Fox Point-Bayside Teachers Association; Rick Congdon, former judge and former chair, Democratic Party of Waukesha County; Deb Dassow, progressive and labor activist, and semi-retired educator; Victor Drover, liberal blogger; Dale Dulberger, party activist; Perry Duman, candidate for the 60th State Assembly District; Brett Eckstein, Democratic attorney; Waring R. Fincke, vice chair, Washington County Democratic Party; Stephanie Findley, chair, 4th Congressional District Democrats; Kelly Gallaher, founding member, Community for Change; Heather Geyer, liberal columnist; Ginny Goode, Grassroots North Shore; Darcy Gustavsson, party activist; Kristin Hansen, neighborhood team leader, Obama for America and co-host, Drinking Liberally Waukesha; Robert Hansen, co-chair of Progressive Democrats of America in Milwaukee County; John Heckenlively, secretary, 1st Congressional District Democrats; Kelly Herda, treasurer, Democratic Party of Wisconsin Women's Caucus and political consultant; Robert Heule, Region 5 Chair, Democratic Party of Milwaukee County; Peter Knudsen, legislative aide and longtime Democratic staffer; Marga Krumins, candidate for 97th State Assembly District and associate chair Democratic Party of Wisconsin Women’s Caucus; Bill Kurtz, candidate for 21st Assembly District; John Lehman, state senator, 21st District; Matthew Lowe, youth outreach director, Waukesha County Democratic Party; Fran Martin, election observer for the Democratic Party and appeared in Wangaard recall ads; Tom Michalski, Oak Creek alderman; Bridget Moen, chair, Democratic Party of Ozaukee County; Meg Moen, treasure, Democratic Party of Ozaukee County; Rick Moze, party activist; Lisa Mux liberal blogger, and co-founder and co-host of Drinking Liberally Waukesha; Thad Nation, political consultant and former aide to Gov. Jim Doyle; Larry Nelson, former Waukesha mayor, current County Board supervisor and delegate to Democratic National Convention; Jason Patzfahl, liberal blogger and founding member of the Progressive 28th Political Action Committee; Jeffrey Perzan , attorney and party activist; Colin Plese, Shorewood School Board member; John Pokrandt, candidate for 13th State Assembly District; Steven Potter, communications aide, state Democratic Party; Jason Rae, Democratic National Committee member; Aaron Robertson, party activist; Chris Rockwood, candidate for 14th State Assembly District; Kristopher Rowe, party activist; Keith Schmitz, member, State Democratic Platform Committee and founding member, Grassroots North Shore; Richard Schwalb, party activist; Erin Sievert, chairwoman, Jefferson County Democrats; Kathleen Slamka, party activist; Eilene Stevens, party activist; Mike Tate, chair , Democratic Party of Wisconsin; Melissa Ugland, business owner and party activist; Sarah Wagner, community activist for Wisconsin Jobs Now; Jamie Wall, candidate for 8th Congressional District; Jim Ward, candidate, 28th State Senate District; Jane Witt, chair of Racine County Democrats; and Graeme Zielinski, communications director, Wisconsin Democratic Party.

Related Topics: 2012 election, Barack Obama, Blue Wisconsin Survey, Mitt Romney, Patch Politics, Red Wisconsin Survey, Tammy Baldwin, Tommy Thompson, participate 2012, and presidential election

Bob McBride

7:35 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Not sorry to see this series go.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve ®

10:51 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Scrolling through the participants is silly

Michael McClusky

8:27 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Enough already! Let the voters decide who they want and we'll proceed from there!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Fred van der Wal

9:09 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

To me, being an American means so much more then holding a legal piece of paper that defines you as a US Citizen. It were not these US Citizen who came to this continent but Europeans who hoped to find a new future.
So today as many go make their selection in that small booth according their conviction and hope that what he/she does will not only improve a personal future but others as well. Then before you make that choice, consider who you choose will not only effect the lives in America but indirect the world as well.
I wish everyone lots of wisdom in their endeavor and hope for a common ground purpose.
Perhaps the next major discussion here on Patch be about football.

Comment_arrow

Michael McClusky

9:30 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@Fred van der Wal Yeah, I would much rather talk about football. Unless, of course, there are Bear fans around. LOL

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

11:26 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@Michael -

What team with a 7-1 record is currently leading their division again?

Comment_arrow

Michael McClusky

11:42 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@Hoffa I see your point. The Pack has not been as consistent as the Bears so far. The Colt game was a fiasco, for instance. Keep in mind that the Bears have to play Houston next and they do have to play the Packers again. The division crown could go down to the wire.

Comment_arrow

Michael McClusky

12:34 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@Hoffa Is there a state statute on the books that gives the right to our citizens to extradite all Bear fans from the State of Wisconsin? If not, what legal challenges would we face if Madison enacted such a law? I cannot see any reasonable objections from anyone in Wisconsin, that is for sure.

Bob McBride

8:55 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

And none of them thought to mention that the losing side, regardless of which one that is, can be counted on to contest voting in those areas effected by the storms on the east cost. What a brilliant bunch.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

9:50 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Joe, one more day of you and we're done - hopefully.

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

10:27 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Joe Bobby is a paid professional of the Obama campaign. Nothing to see here.

Comment_arrow

Joseph Robert

8:13 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

CONGRATULATIONS to all of the millions of smart people who voted for
Obama-Biden!!!! We did it!!!!!

We crushed extremism, racism, voter suppression, anonymous money, hatred of minorities -- with sound ideas, moderation and truth!

wlslady and donnaw- Take a valium and stop your constant scare tactics, please. It didn't work for Karl Rove, the radical Koch Brothers and Mr. Adelson, and won't work for you, either.

Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney can now go shopping for new shirts at COSTCO, and Mitt can work on his car elevator in La Jolla. LMAO. Yippee!

Hopefully the country can now coalesce around OBAMA-BIDEN, and not work (like Sen. McConnell had done) mostly for the benefit of one party or another!!! Hoorah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hoorah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We WON BIG-TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

U - S - A!! U-S-A!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joseph Robert

9:07 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Thank you, President Obama for your many achievements, despite strong Republican obstructions:

+ Led the killing of Osama Bin Laden.
+ Improved US relationships with most allies.
+ Directed killing of several leaders of Al Qaida.
+ Implemented harsh sanctions on Iran.
+ Brought together coalition to remove dictator Gaddhafi from power in Libya.
+ Implemented Obamacare to provide healthcare for millions of people who previously did not have health coverage, and to mandate several health cost-cutting measures.
+ Ended the discriminatory Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy in the military.
+ Supports same-sex marriage.
+ Supports the equal pay act to provide equal pay for women and men.
+ Led the nation out of worst recession (gotten into by Bush) in many decades.
+ Implemented stimulus act to revive economy.
+ Ended war in Iraq, an unnecessary and unbudgeted war started by George W Bush.
+ Began drawdown of war in Afghanistan.
+ Passed necessary Wall Street reform to prevent future financial collapse.
+ Helped turn around auto industry.
+ And, much, much more!

FORWARD! with Obama-Biden! Not back to the Bush years

Reply
Comment_arrow

yomammy

10:13 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

oh, the president led the killing of osama...ok...
improved relations by apologising or bowing to them...
Directed leaders of al quidea...like every other president...
Stronly worded letters to Iran....
supports every possible group that helps him get relected...
Brought on oblama care...cost= trillion+ for 10% of US citizens..
gave ton of money to auto industry---costing us hundreds of billions for mismanaged business

Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

10:21 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

The President NEVER apologized to anyone out of the country.
He also saved the auto industry and American jobs. American car makers are not expanding.

The rest of your digs are Conservative propaganda not even worth debunking. They have been shot down enough and are just plain whacky.

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

10:28 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Joe Bobby is a paid professional of the Obama campaign. Nothing to see here.

Comment_arrow

yomammy

10:39 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

ford managed without him...

Comment_arrow

The Anti-Alinsky

10:46 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Joe Bobby, go back to Alemeda. The voters in California are more gullible than Wisconsin!

Comment_arrow

The Anti-Alinsky

10:50 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Sigh, looks like I will have to repost my response to Joe Bobby from Sunday:
Troll Joe Bobby from Alemeda, California wrote:
“Thank you, President Obama for your many achievements, despite strong Republican obstructions:”
“+ Led the killing of Osama Bin Laden.”
Navy Seal Team 6 did that while Obama did NOTHING in the situation room

“+ Improved US relationships with most allies.”
By starting his Presidency with an apology tour

“+ Directed killing of several leaders of Al Qaida.”
As was done under Bush-43

“+ Implemented harsh sanctions on Iran.”
Yet they are still proceeding with Uranium enrichment

“+ Brought together coalition to remove dictator Gaddhafi from power in Libya.”
All he did was jump on a Revolution well under way and send up a few drones.

“+ Implemented Obamacare to provide healthcare for millions of people who previously did not have health coverage, and to mandate several health cost-cutting measures.”
Which is now costing an average $3,000 per family (and more to come)

“+ Ended the discriminatory Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy in the military.
+ Supports same-sex marriage.
+ Supports the equal pay act to provide equal pay for women and men.”
With the economy as sucky as it is, are these really issues?

“+ Led the nation out of worst recession (gotten into by Bush) in many decades.”
Then why is our economic outlook so bleak, and REAL unemployment around 12%

Comment_arrow

The Anti-Alinsky

10:50 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

continued:
“+ Implemented stimulus act to revive economy.”
Which only cost us $110,000 to create each job. Which could explain why our economic outlook is so bleak.

“+ Ended war in Iraq, an unnecessary and unbudgeted war started by George W Bush.
+ Began drawdown of war in Afghanistan.”
Saddam Hussein was a threat with WMDs, so it was necessary to get rid of him. The wars against Saddam Hussein and the Taliban only lasted a few weeks. We are fighting against the next brutal dictator in each of those countries.

“+ Passed necessary Wall Street reform to prevent future financial collapse.
All he did was add more stifling regulation

“+ Helped turn around auto industry.”
All B.O. did was prop up the unions. GM and Chrysler would have been better off to follow Ford’s example

“+ And, much, much more!”
like Benghazi (wait, I thought we were now loved in the Middle East)
Increasing the national debt by 6 TRILLION dollars
Increasing annual spending by 27%
Increasing annual deficit instead of halving it AS PROMISED!

“Let's go FORWARD!, not back to the Bush years!”
Yup, just keep charging forward to the Lenin/Stalin years, they will be so wonderful!

Comment_arrow

Greg

11:13 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Republican obstruction is a lame excuse for poor leadership. Obama does not know how to lead.

Comment_arrow

Michael

2:45 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

keep telling yourself these things when you go to bed tonight knowing that the free world has a new leader in the morning

Craig

9:23 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

JoeBobbie:
+ Osama Bin Laden.(The American Military did this, started by Bush)
+ US relationships (the apology tour undermined the USA's resolve in the eyes of our enemies)
+ killing of Al Qaida.(Bush's fault, he started it)
+ sanctions on Iran. (is it working yet? centrifuges are spinning)
+ remove dictator Gaddhafi. (This is the worst mistake- remove a man from power who left the USA alone since Clinton put a missle in his home! Now we have Muslim Brotherhood running the Country and terror attacks on our embassy)
+ Obamacare (at an expence too large for the middle class to handle, expect even more food stamp recipients)
+ Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (to get gay rights votes)
+ Supports same-sex marriage. (for votes)
+ equal pay act (federal law already provides for this)
+ Led the nation out of worst recession (Unemployment is higher now than before)
+ Implemented stimulus act to revive economy. (it didn't work at all)
+ Ended war in Iraq (a few years later than he promised)
+ Began drawdown of war in Afghanistan.
+ Wall Street reform (nothing has changed, you are sadly mistaken)
+ auto industry. (allowed bankruptcy under another name)
+ And nothing more!

This is a total failure of historic proportions. If Obama was the CEO of your company, you would have to fire him- or go broke!

Reply
Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

9:30 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@ Craig- I need to tell you, we are not voting for a CEO. We are voting for the President of the United States. These are two very different jobs.

Comment_arrow

John Feia

9:53 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@Craig
Thanks for highlighting many of our President's accomplishments. Your foolish interpretations aside, these are the reasons he will continue to be our President the next 4 years.

Comment_arrow

yomammy

10:17 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

we do need a president...to bad we dont have one now...

Comment_arrow

The Anti-Alinsky

10:53 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

FreeThought Troy wrote: "@ Craig- I need to tell you, we are not voting for a CEO. We are voting for the President of the United States. These are two very different jobs."

True Free, but the objectives are the same, to improve the condition of the entity they run, business or government. Since B.O. has yet to accomplish ANYTHING productive, he needs to be fired!

Comment_arrow

Craig

11:00 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

John and Troy: That is correct, we are not voting for a CEO. Being the President of the United States IS a JOB- like being a CEO is a job. Obama never had a real job, so it is not his fault he has been unable to perform the duties of the President. Conversely, a CEO knows how to balance budgets and guide a business with proper planning 1, 3, 5, even 10 years down the road. A CEO knows how to adjust as things change from plan. This ability of a CEO makes him uniquely qualified for President.
You are fully entitled to your opinion of our existing President's accomplishments. My opinion is far different, and to be honest I am worried sick that if he wins re election- my life and many other middle class members lives will change for the worse.
We can agree to disagree.
But I am sure we agree that whatever happens; we should hope it is good for our Country. John, I am not your enemy. I just feel four more years of the same will be too much for this Nation to recover from.
I can tell you this: If Romney wins and adds $5 trillion more debt, I will not vote for him again. Our Nation's $16.2 Trillion debt is devastating. When an economy is incapable of creating the same amount in GDP, the US is on the verge of default.
I do not pray that MY man wins, I pray that the right man wins.
In my heart I firmly believe the right man is Mitt Romney.

Comment_arrow

John Feia

11:07 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@Craig
I agree we should be able to agree to disagree. Personally (if you haven't already figured it out yet) I hope that it is our current President. Whatever the result, I hope that the Congress will work with the President to attempt to achieve some results which has been a very absent function the pats 4 years.

Comment_arrow

Craig

11:18 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

John: I actually almost changed my mind four years ago when I cast my vote. I took a few minutes and thought about voting for Obama, as McCain wasn't my favorite man to begin with. I hoped for the right man to win, even if I voted for the other.
If things had improved by now, I may actually have voted for Obama today.
I see things differently than you do- I see things have deteriorated under the POTUS.
Mitt was never the favorite of the extreem right, he is a moderate in my opinion.
Should he win the election, maybe we have a chance at bipartisanship.
We can only hope for cooperation, too much is at stake.

Comment_arrow

The Anti-Alinsky

2:58 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

John Feia wrote: "...Whatever the result, I hope that the Congress will work with the President to attempt to achieve some results which has been a very absent function the pats 4 years..."

True John, B.O. has accomplished nothing these last four years.

Which makes me ask the question...Why would you even consider voting for him again???

Comment_arrow

Michael McClusky

10:38 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@Katherine You are right on target!

Eagle

9:51 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

We are voting for the CEO for the United States of America. The current CEO with his policies have lowered the the stock value of the country. It is time hire a proven leader to right the ship.

Reply
Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

9:54 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

A CEO is hired to make a company profitable. They have a way of putting proffits a head of people. That is not the job of the President. They are hired to protect and defend the Constitution. Nothing in that document states the country should be profitable. It is there to grant and ensure rights to all Americans.

It is a very different job function. People over profit. We have business for profit. We have government for people.

Comment_arrow

H.E. Pennypacker

9:55 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Troy, get your mouth off of the teat of the taxpayers.

Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

9:57 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

HE - Get your head out of the bum of Fox News

Comment_arrow

Eagle

10:07 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Free Thought Troy - do you not get the point? it is LEADERSHIP and love of county and the Constitution. Romney respects it with Obama thinks it is to restrictive and works around it.

Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

10:11 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Eagle - I don't know where you came up with that?

The President has spent the past four years trying to expand freedom and opportunity to all Americans. The Republican Party has spent it with its number one priority to make Obama a one term president. Not love of country - victory for the party.

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

10:32 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Free Thought Troy- Please give me one example of expansion of freedom that Obama has enacted?

Comment_arrow

Eagle

10:32 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Expand freedom to all americans how? I am actually curious how he has expanded freedom (always had it) and opportunity (always had it) for all americans. Please no talking points about saving the auto industry (had laws to handle that) and bottom up economics (see unemployment numbers vs. new debt).

Comment_arrow

H.E. Pennypacker

10:35 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I don't watch Fox News, I don't watch any TV actually. My news comes from NPR and WSJ.

Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

10:37 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Brian
Lily Leadbedder Act
Employer compensation for BC
Obama Care expanding Health Insurance to millions of Americans
Repeal of DADT
Hate crimes legislation
Executive discontinue of deportation of immigrants serving in military or going to college if borh in the US & never lived anywhere else

These aren't talking points, Brian. They are facts

Comment_arrow

H.E. Pennypacker

10:40 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Yes, NoThoughtTroy is 12 years old.

Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

10:43 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

There you go, HE!!!

A personal insult. I was wondering when that was coming. It took this long - wow. When it doubt and on the wrong end of an argument - personal attacks and insults. Glad to see the trend continue.

Comment_arrow

yomammy

10:48 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

that was a personal insult?!?!
wow...thin skin much???!?

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

10:51 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

FTT- I thought you said expansion of freedom. Women already had protection under the Lilly Ledbetter Act. Didn't expand a thing other than the filing time. I'm thinking BC is birth control. Already had the freedom to choose birth control. But Obama took my religious freedom away becaus I have to pay for it. DADT, you have got to be kidding. Really? You really have nothing, don't you. Obamacare is the biggest government imposition on freedom enacted ever. Nice try.

Comment_arrow

Eagle

11:01 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Here is a list of more freedoms we have earned - 923 executive orders so far by Obama (bypassing congress and teh constitution)
#10990 - allows gov't to seize control of all modes of transportation
#10995 - allows gov't to control all communication media
#11001 - allows gov't to contol all eduaction, health and welfare functions
#11005 - allows gov't to take over railroads, inland waterways adn public storage facilities.
to many freedoms to list here, look up for yourself. Does this sound like a free country or building a framework to nationalize private industry?.

Comment_arrow

Eagle

11:10 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Lily Leadbedder Act (is it a companies fault if a female accepts a lower offer for the same job?) (If a man makes less than a female, can he sue too?)
Obama Care expanding Health Insurance to millions of Americans (by reducing everyone elses on teh way to a single payor system) NOT GOOD!! Plus high cost and a TAX if you do not comply (FREEDOM TO THE CORE)
Repeal of DADT (This is a good thing? no concensus here)
Hate crimes legislation (isn't all crime HATE?)

Comment_arrow

The Anti-Alinsky

11:12 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

FreeThoughtTroy wrote:

"Lily Leadbedder Act"
Free, this just extended the time frame, the guts of the fair pay act was already there. BTW, a similiar act passed the House in 2007, but failed in the Democrat controlled Senate, where B.O. was a member.

"Employer compensation for BC"
???

"Obama Care expanding Health Insurance to millions of Americans"
And it's only going to cost me personally an additional $4,000/year by 2014

"Repeal of DADT"
Really, he's about to decimate the military and your concerned with Don't Ask Don't Tell that was implemented under Clinton?

"Hate crimes legislation"
Free, a crime is a crime. I personally don't care if someone assaults me because I'm white or any other reason. The act itself should determine the punishment, not the motivation!

"Executive discontinue of deportation of immigrants serving in military or going to college if borh in the US & never lived anywhere else"
Free, if they were born here they are already citizens, as detailed in the 14th Amendment. As far as those born elsewhere but having spent most of their life here, I don't have a real problem with coming up with an streamlined citizenship program. However, until they take the oath, they are still non-citizens that need to abide by our immigration laws!

Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

11:31 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Brian:
Lilly Ledbetter Act - Filing time is the key as wht defence do women have if they don't have knowledge of discrimination? This actually helps the economy as women tend to spend more than men.
Obama never touched your religious freedom. You are welcome to worship as you chose - tax exempt I may add. Catholic Institutions are not obligated to pay for birth control (BC). Insurance companies do in that circumstance. That was the compromise - I know, compromise, what is that to a Republican?
DADT - yes really. After another survey of our military, the repeal of DADT had no effect, thus proving wrong all the critics. We still have the best military in the world.
We may always disagree with Obamacare. If you are that concerned about the cost, then write the Congress and ask for single payer. That will clear everything up.

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

12:25 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

FTT- Under Lilly ledbetter, she was already not limited by statute and that was ner her argument, and in fact, she said she knew of the discrimination long before her filing. http://blog.heritage.org/2012/10/19/president-obamas-misleading-account-of-lilly-ledbetter-equal-pay-case/

And about Obamacare, Newland v. Sebalius proved that Obamacare violated first amendment rights by mandating that insurance must have abortion coverage, sterilization and contraceptives. The court rightly ruled in favor of Newland, who owned a family-owned business with high Catholic beliefs. There are other such lawsuits as well. It is your right to have an abortion, sterilization or use contraceptives. It is no one else's responsibility to pay for it but you. So that was obviously trying to take freedom away by Obama.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

1:18 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@FreeThought Troy -

The discovery rule already applied to the application of the statute of limitations of the Equal Pay Act of 1964. The Lilly Ledbetter Act basically took the teeth out of the statute of limitations and the reasons behind it (to create an equal, fair, and reliable environment for litigation) - witnesses die or become unable to locate, memories fade, records get lost or misplaced, etc. The LLA was little more than a cheap political pander meant to attract easily influenced, and not very bright women to the Democratic Party political machine.

Catholic institutions that employee people and offer health insurance as an employment benefit purchase group policies from outside private insurance providers. If Obamacare mandates that all policies offered by private insurance providers must cover the costs of contraceptive BC, then that's an additional expense that must be born by the the person/entity that is paying the policy premium - in your example, that entity would be the Catholic employer.

Thus, Obamacare effectively forces the Catholic employer to pay the premium for a policy that covers contraceptive BC. This is fundamentally wrong and un-American. Nothing is preventing the woman from purchasing a supplemental policy to cover BC if she doesn't want to pay for her birth control cash-out-of-pocket - which would actually be the more economically beneficially way to pay for BC, as opposed to insurance.

Get a clue already!

Comment_arrow

The Anti-Alinsky

3:09 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

FreeThoughtTroy wrote: "...Obama never touched your religious freedom. You are welcome to worship as you chose - tax exempt I may add. Catholic Institutions are not obligated to pay for birth control (BC). Insurance companies do in that circumstance..."

BC=Birth Control. Apparently somewhere in Free's mind it makes sense to make an acronym out of everything. TJPS.

Free, there are two flaws in your supposition. First, since the employer is paying for a large part of that insurance, they have a vested interest, and forcing them to pay for something that violates their beliefs is unconscionable. Second, there are many, many, many employers that self insure, giving them a larger control over the decision to offer something like birth control. Again, forcing them to do that is simply immoral, and likely violates the separation of church and state.

Eagle

9:53 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Today is the largest stockholders meeting in history. I can only hope we hire the RIGHT person for the job. That person is Mitt Romney.

Reply

Keith Best

9:56 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Romney/ Ryan by a minimum of 5 points. And then of course Tommy will be our next senator. Wisconsin is not gonna elect someone who has more in common with Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez than the people of this state.

Reply
Comment_arrow

yomammy

10:18 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

trouble is the pile of socialism lovers in mad-town and milwaukee...

Comment_arrow

John Feia

10:36 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Trouble is people like you who spew non sensible comments that have no relevance.

Comment_arrow

John Feia

10:42 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@ Keith Best
Your opinions are obviously swayed by idiotic campaign ads. Can you come up with a logical defense for your statements?

Comment_arrow

yomammy

10:46 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Discussion with a leftie...

me: I dont think obama is doing very well as presi..
lefties: you are racist!!!!
me: um, no...i was just saying i dont agree with the directions he is tak...
lefties: RACIST!!!!
me: NO dangit!! I think we had better leadership under..
lefties: racist racist racist!!! and you hate poor people!!!!

Comment_arrow

John Feia

10:53 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@yomammy
Like I said: "Trouble is people like you who spew non sensible comments that have no relevance."

Comment_arrow

c

11:21 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@John Freia

You don't agree that communism/socialism is more tolerated and even celebrated in Madison and Milwaukee???

James R Hoffa

11:48 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Who else would personally love to see the tears falling from Schmitzy's eyes when Obama/Biden/Baldwin are all defeated today?

Reply
Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

11:53 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Has anyone wondered what would happen if all three won? It is a real posibiltiy.

Will the Conservatives here accept this? Would they have that ability? If so, would they even be able to use it?

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

12:07 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I don't picture Keith doing a lot of crying. Swearing, ranting, howling about cheating, lying and racism followed up with a lot of drinking, perhaps. I'm just thankful I won't be around to witness the initial bomb blast of the enormous temper tantrum that will, ultimately, go on until...when's the next round of these things?...2014? - should that be the way this election goes.

Comment_arrow

Craig

12:10 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Troy: I have. It scares me to think about it, will it take us past the point of recovering?
IDK, but I also worry regardless of who wins, it may be too late.
I am not trying to get all 'doom and gloom', but has anyone else felt that it may be too late for the USA to once again become an economic superpower?

Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

12:17 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I have felt that way for a while, now, Craig. Ever since the Debt Ceiling debacle and the credit downgrade.

Where do we go from here? Is it so bad we are no longer on top of the world? Considering the alternative seems to point to China, I would agree it is a bad thing. A very bad thing.

Comment_arrow

Craig

1:01 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

If we all could agree on the right path to get us back on top, we would not be in the mess we are in now.
I wish it was simple, and we all agreed on the method to get there.

Comment_arrow

FreeThought Troy

2:01 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I agree, Craig.

If there are any lessons to be learned from this election, no matter the winners, I hope we can all get to a place of rational discussion and cooperative measures.

On both sides. I know I am partisian on the Patch, but I acknowledge both sides tend to have issues with this.

Comment_arrow

Craig

2:28 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Troy: What I would like to see is a Government of the people- key word of.
Like jury duty- replace all elected positions with people from a pool. Preserve their job for 2 or 4 years while they serve as our representative. No more lobby needed. No more under the table deals, just plain old common sence.
I bet a lot more would get done.

John Feia

12:50 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

The beauty is that although we may have differing opinions, we all have the same right. One vote. I just came back from the polling place with my wife and grand daughter. Three for the good guys! However you vote, nothing is more cool than seeing your grandchild vote for the first time!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

12:56 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

@Feia -

"Three for the good guys" - so you all voted Republican?

Comment_arrow

Craig

12:58 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

John: Congrats!
Let's hope your grand daughter has a better future ahead.
That is something we all want, and something we all agree on.

Greg

12:56 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I just had a upstanding representative of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin stop in my office to remind us to vote. He gave me a card with a nice picture of what I assume are Democrats at a rally. The picture has two older women, one middle age man, one older man, one middle aged woman, a teen girl and some people in the background. ALL BLACK, no white people, no hispanic people, no asian people. This must be the party or racists, what about the rest of us?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg

1:05 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

A scan of the card is in the picture section. Unlike Jason P. I don't just make this stuff up.

Comment_arrow

yomammy

1:07 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

careful- by noticing the picture facts, you will be labeld here by certain people...

Comment_arrow

Greg

1:22 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I did not say he was a Democrat. He did look like hell though.

Leave a comment