It seems like the SEC shutting down another Ponzi scheme has become a weekly occurrence. Ponzi schemes have been around since the 1920’s and are a fraudulent investment. They can be designed in many different ways. One popular design is for the first investors to be given the money that later investors put into the scheme. The scheme can continue until there are no new investors. Although the schemes can be hard to identify, there are several ways you can protect yourself from them.
1. Insure your portfolio is held at a third party custodian — This is the easiest way to avoid a Ponzi scheme. One way the promoter hides the scheme is by issuing fake or doctored statements. When your investments are held at a third party custodian, you will receive regular statements directly from the custodian. You can then compare what your investment advisor says to what the custodian says. Any discrepancies should be looking into immediately. Examples of third party custodians are Schwab, Fidelity, TD Ameritrade, Scott Trade, and Trust Company of America. If Bernie Madoff’s clients had demanded the use of a third party custodian, his scheme would have never worked.
2. Ask for the prospectus — You should always request a copy of the prospectus, which is a legal document detailing the investment. This document is required for most all investments offered in the US, and is filed with the SEC. You may not want to read through the entire document, but promoters of Ponzi schemes most likely won’t be able to give you the document because the “investment” isn’t actually an investment.
3. Be wary of consistent or higher than normal returns — Ponzi schemes often promote returns that are much higher than you can get in “regular” investments. If you see an investment consistently beating the market, be very cautious. Research has shown time and time again that investment managers can’t consistently beat the market. Consistent returns are also a red flag. If you see an investment earning 10 percent every year for 5 years in a row, something is wrong.
4. Trust your gut — Too many times, people that get suckered into Ponzi schemes express knowing the “investment” was too good to be true, but just couldn’t resist the promised returns. Trust your instincts when something feels wrong. If you are on the fence, consult a fiduciary investment advisor (that has nothing to do with the scheme or the promoter) that can be sure the investment is right for you.
The only guarantee a Ponzi scheme has is that it will destroy your portfolio. Very smart people have been duped into turning over their life savings in order to earn high returns, only to wake up and realize all of their money is gone. Trust your instincts to know that if it looks too good to be true, it is. And if you just aren’t sure, consult an expert that can help evaluate the investment.
So what do you think? Have you, or anyone you known, gotten duped into a Ponzi scheme? Have you ever been solicited to invest in one? What made you decide to invest, or not invest, in the scheme?
The Donny Show
3:02 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Fool proof idea. Dont invest. Store your cash under the mattress.
Craig
3:48 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Donny: Best investment: Guns and Ammo. This is the only way to protect what you have and prevent others from taking it away. When was the last time you saw the price of firearms drop?
Alan Moore, MS, CFP®
3:13 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Donny, unfortunately putting money under the mattress guarantees it will not grow, and with the effects of inflation, it means the money under the mattress will actually shrink. Investing can be quite scary, but for most it is necessary in order to accomplish their financial goals.
The Donny Show
3:51 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Sorry, Alan. I have to disagree. Money under the mattress is my way of security. Protects it from thieves. bad managers, and provides a smooth sleeping surface.
Alfred
4:04 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Don't take this personally Alan, but you are a sales person and you don't eat unless you sell something. Of course you are going to say what you say, plus I don't like how finanical planning is simply a ruse for more life insurance.
Nuitari
4:16 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Every person that has to live off of money passing through their hand is a crook in my book. They prosper off the lack of knowledge of their customers. Anything in sales, banking, investing, insurance and real estate can be a shady affair. I admit most are good people in those industries, but after these last few years, everyone is after a buck, and these professionals already have the upper hand.
Craig
4:21 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Alfred: If you are afraid of the 'ruse', there is a way to prevent this from happening. Go to a fee based advisor, who only tells you where to put your money, you can then go to anyone you like.
I can tell you that one never has enough life insurance when you find out you are no longer insurable and the end is near.
GearHead
11:59 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
@ Nuitari: Don't be silly. All of the industries you mentioned are highly useful and make their money by adding value. They save you either time, aquistion of your own talent, money or all three.
Alan Moore, MS, CFP®
4:36 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Alfred, I do not sell any products and therefore do not profit in any way from the recommendations I make to my clients. The only thing I sell in my practice is advice. We are fee-only, which means no commissions at any time. I agree that the term financial planner has been severely misused by salesmen and it is something I wish we could fix.
I appreciate all of the great comments, as they give me ideas for future blog posts. In fact, if you have questions or want to see a topic addressed, e-mail me at alan@serenityfc.com
Alfred
4:39 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
I don't honestly believe anyone when they say they are fee based only, especially with the variety of contingency/profit sharing arrangements insurance carriers and wholesalers offer to the retail distribution model. The SEC and various state insurance commissioners are too lazy to stop the double dipping that goes on in the insurance business.
Alan Moore, MS, CFP®
4:53 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Alfred, I appreciate your honesty. Truth is, advisors that claim to be fee-based are double dipping. Fee-based refers to those that earn a fee for services and commission from the sale of products. My firm, and the national organizations I am a member of such as http://www.napfa.org and http://www.garrettplanningnetwork.com/ require members to be fee-only, which means no commissions at any time.
Again, thanks for the great comments. I always appreciate learning what consumers are thinking about financial planners, and trying to help correct the immense amount of misinformation out there. Truth is, a lot of the misinformation has been spread by fee-based advisors to confuse consumers into thinking fee-based and fee-only are the same.
Here is a great summary from NAPFA on what fee-only really means. http://napfa.org/userfiles/file/NAPFA%20OUR%20STORY%20-%20100908.pdf
GearHead
11:54 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Here is one more to add to your four. The fifth way to avoid a Ponzi scheme is to arrange your affairs and investments in such a way that you don't have to depend on Social Security - the greatest Ponzi scheme of all time!
Dirk Gutzmiller
5:00 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Many of those caught in Ponzi schemes were undoubtedly advocates of less government regulation. Too bad for them, as they descend into a much more modest lifestyle. Life would be even worse if the government was not actively pursuing the assets of these crooked operators and trying to recover at least a portion of the ill-gotten gains to the victims.
prolife mom
5:37 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Dirk, are you serious? Have you done any research on the SEC's fumbling of Madoff?
GearHead
5:38 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
@ Dirk: I'd feel a lot better about your silly statement if the government wasn't pursuing the assets of legitimate businesses (like GM) and turning them over to crooked operators like the UAW. How do the former GM stockholders (like your 401K) and bondholders get any redress from the ill-gotten gains of government-sponsored looting?