After Spending Nearly $1 Million, Gov. Scott Walker Ends Outside Legal Pact

This story was written by Bill Lueders
Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is wrapping up his contract with a politically connected law firm to help fight legal challenges over changes to collective bargaining for public employees, with payments from state coffers nearing the $1 million mark. 

A recent amendment to the state’s special counsel contract with the law firm of Michael Best & Friedrich said the pact will expire “upon payment of the final invoice.” The amendment, filed with the Secretary of State’s office on July 9, gives the contract’s final total as $961,035.61. 

Walker spokesman Tom Evenson said Michael Best was hired at the request of the Department of Justice and helped it handle “multiple strains of litigation” challenging the collective bargaining changes, passed into law as 2011 Act 10.

Evenson said the state has, with Michael Best’s help, prevailed in all five challenges that have been litigated to a final resolution. There are three pending cases, all brought by labor unions. One is awaiting a ruling in federal court, one is in Dane County Circuit Court, and one is now before the state Supreme Court.

The case before the Supreme Court will review a lower court ruling that struck down parts of the law as unconstitutional.

Executive Assistant Attorney General Steven Means said the Department of Justice feels it can handle the remaining cases without additional outside help.

“The total mass of the workload is getting less,” Means said. “Hopefully, we’re getting to the end of the Act 10 litigation.”

Means said outside counsel could be rehired if “something unexpected were to happen.”

The decision to hire outside counsel was made in part because most Department of Justice attorneys are represented by a union, and thus are affected by the Act 10 changes. Means said the litigation has been and will continue to be handled by two non-union assistant attorneys general.

Fight Over Act 10 Was a Lengthy One

Michael Best was originally hired by Walker on Feb. 7, 2011, four days before he announced plans to impose sweeping changes to the collective bargaining rights of public employees. The original contract was for $50,000, and set a rate of reimbursement of up to $300 per hour.

The contract has since been amended several times to increase its duration and maximum payment amount. Prior to the recent amendment, the last revision was in March 2012, when the amount was raised to $850,000. The per hour fee has not changed. 

Michael Best has long been state Republicans’ go-to law firm for outside representation. The firm has  represented Republican lawmakers on legislative redistricting and has received $368,879 for legal services from Walker’s campaign, state records show. 

Walker’s contract for representation over collective bargaining challenges was signed by Michael Best attorney Raymond Taffora, formerly chief legal counsel for Republican Gov. Tommy Thompson. Taffora worked for the state Department of Justice until January 2011, shortly before the first contract.

Taffora referred a reporter to the governor’s office, saying “comments on these matters are for the client rather than for the lawyers.”

Spokesman Says Unions Are At Fault

Evenson blamed the law’s opponents for the costs incurred in defending against the challenges.

“All of this effort and state expense wouldn’t have been necessary if it weren’t for the repeated attempts to overturn a law enacted by the people’s representatives and upheld in every case where we’ve had a final decision,” he said.

And while the determination was made that the state no longer needs outside legal help, Evenson said: “We are confident Act 10 will ultimately be upheld in all remaining cases.” 

The nonprofit Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism (www.WisconsinWatch.org) collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.