Lake Parkway Extension Faces Funding Challenge

But public support could help extension get built, County Supervisor Pat Jursik says.

Work continues to get I-794/Lake Parkway extended through Oak Creek, but getting money for the project figures to be a challenge.

That's where the public could come in and help persuade the state Department of Transportation the project is worth it, County Supervisor Pat Jursik said at an economic development forum Thursday.

Jursik led a committee that studied and recommended an extension of the Lake Parkway to Highway 100 in Oak Creek.

Public comments taken earlier this year showed residents supported the extension by more than a 2-to-1 margin. The extension also has support from the Milwaukee County Board and Oak Creek Common Council.

"That corridor is extremely important in the South Shore communities," Jursik said. "That is the corridor that moves folks through our communities."

But the project has an estimated price tag of $207 million — a major hurdle and concern of the DOT. 

"The largest concern (the DOT) is going to have is with regard to finding the funding to do it," Jursik said.

"I believe it's going to be public input, public pressure, that will eventually get 794 built."

Before plans get to the DOT, a technical subcommitee and the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission will review the proposal. An air quality analysis is also being completed, Jursik said. 

Supporters say an extension would help spark economic development, relieve congestion on local streets and make it easier for residents on the South Shore to get downtown. The proposed road generally follows the same footprint as the Union Pacific Railroad, which means business and homes would be largely unaffected.

Besides the cost, noise, water runoff and the configuration of the interchanges have been some of the concerns raised.

Under preliminary plans, interchanges would be installed at Rawson, Drexel and Puetz, with an overpass at Forest Hill Avenue at an at-grade intersection at Highway 100.

mau October 01, 2012 at 09:17 PM
The headline in Sunday's Racine Journal Times: Cities: Restore our funding Local leaders want state to bring back cut shared revenues. The cities are bitching to Walker about wanting money. Money to pay for such important items as palm trees for the Racine beach during the summer. So where do the advocates expect to get this money for the extension. Does the state have a magic hat full of money or pot of gold?
Mike in OC October 01, 2012 at 10:11 PM
funny how tom barrett wants to spend $220 million for a trolly that no one will use.... and this 207 million project that would benefit thousands of residents in the southern suburbs will probably be stalled because of lack of funding.
Mike Fischer October 02, 2012 at 12:36 PM
As I understand it, the guy who got the contract for the North Beach Oasis paid to bring in the palm trees. Not the city. And didn't the article you're referencing say that more taxes were taken in than expected this year? Since the tax projections were used to set the budget, it seems reasonable to me to discuss what to do with the leftover money.
Bill Smith October 02, 2012 at 02:40 PM
Mike You make a valid point.The problem is that you just have too much common sense.Libs hate cars ,they want to herd the masses into trains and buses.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »