.
Feedback

Supportive Crowd Asks Obama to Focus on Jobs

Several hundred people were outside Master Lock in Milwaukee as President Barack Obama came to visit.

Dennis Gray is quite familiar with Master Lock, having worked for the company for eight years in the 1990s before leaving for a different job.

Now unemployed, Gray stood outside the Master Lock plant on a warmer-than-usual, sunny Wednesday, anxiously awaiting the arrival of President Barack Obama.

Gray, a boilermaker by trade, is hoping Master Lock will hire him back. But he has his name on several waiting lists, desperate for just about any kind of job.

He expressed optimism that Obama's plans will help create more jobs, especially in areas like this one.

"The central city needs it," he said.

That statement summed up the general mood Wednesday at the corner of 33rd and Clarke streets, outside the Master Lock employee parking lot. Some hope and a feeling just a little short of desperation for the president to do something – anything – to help people find work.

The crowd swelled to hundreds of people as Obama's visit drew closer, with a line down the block about three-deep. People checked their phones and announced updates on the president's location.

"Air Force One has landed!" a woman yelled.

A large group outside the plant entrance held a sign urging Obama to pass legislation creating more jobs. Pro-jobs chants like "Bail out the people, not the banks" were shouted as a drum beat loudly, and a few people made their support of a recall of Gov. Scott Walker clear.

A heavy police presence was on hand and blocked off the streets surrounding the facility.

Many of the people lived in the neighborhood and came to catch a glimpse of the president's motorcade. Many screamed excitedly when the motorcade finally made its way down the street about 12:30 p.m.

Damian McClendon, who lives just two blocks away, said he tried to get his kids excused from school to see the "historic event."

That didn't happen, but McClendon and his wife were still on hand to watch the president arrive. Like Gray, McClendon was hopeful the president would be able to expand on the "insourcing" for which Master Lock has been praised.

Master Lock says it has brought about 100 jobs back to the United States since mid-2010. Its efforts gained attention from Obama, who invited chief executive John Heppner to the White House and mentioned the company in his State of the Union speech.

Obama took it a step further Wednesday when he visited the plant in person and continued to emphasize the importance of bringing jobs to America.

In his speech, he called for tax cuts for American manufacturers and higher taxes for companies who send jobs overseas, according to an Associated Press report.

"Ask what you can do to bring jobs back to your country, and your country will do everything we can to help you succeed," he said.

Obama arrived at Mitchell International Airport in the late morning. He was greeted by Gov. Scott Walker, who presented him with a Brewers jersey, and Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett. Check out Fox 6 for video of the president getting off the plane.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Oak Creek Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Mark Czerniec February 16, 2012 at 06:27 pm
Craig, you're shifting the blame from the investment firms to the borrowers, and that's absurd. You specifically singled out "minorities" -- and okay, "racist" may be harsher word than I should have chosen -- but you are nonetheless pinning the Great Recession on racial minorities. The fact is that the Fair Housing and Community Reinvestment acts apply only to banks under FDIC jurisdiction which, according to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, accounted for just 6% of all high-cost loans. Minority borrowers are just a convenient scapegoat.
James R Hoffa February 16, 2012 at 06:27 pm
@Mark -
" It was caused by unregulated investment firms that took the warning labels off iffy mortgages, mixed them all up an in blender, then poured them out as quality investments to their customers -- even while betting against these derivatives themselves." Actually, the blame would lie at the hands of the ratings agencies and not the investment banks, as you claim, wouldn't it? And how exactly does Dodd-Frank in anyway regulate the ratings agencies? That's why Dodd-Frank is nothing but pure bs.
James R Hoffa February 16, 2012 at 06:37 pm
@Mark -
Yep, and just like Carter, under Bush it was just a straight up loan with no hanky-panky crony shenanigans. The UAW (for GM) and Fiat (for Chrysler) didn't come into the picture until Obama got his hands on it, did they? Not to even mention Obama's appointed car czar, which attempted to run both companies in a quasi-nationalized fashion. I don't seem to recall a czar being a part of Bush's rescue plan, do you? Again, change for the worse!
Mark Czerniec February 16, 2012 at 06:41 pm
James, I can't keep looking things for you. Subtitle C: http://bit.ly/xTonDq
James R Hoffa February 16, 2012 at 06:56 pm
@Mark -
If it wasn't a failure, then why did Obama feel the need to say what he said and actually laugh about it in the process of saying it? I guess I just don't understand the liberal sense of humor.
mau February 16, 2012 at 07:41 pm
I seem to recall Ford didn't take the bailout. I think they survived and are still in business. Wouldn't that be considered a success story?
Craig February 16, 2012 at 07:50 pm
"I actually praised Carter. Had it not been changed, that system would still be working well today.
It was the subsequent administrations on both sides of the aisle that turned it into a monster." I also pointed out jumbo loans being the tipping point; once big money was involved, it turned to crap. How am I blaming minorities?
235301 February 16, 2012 at 08:07 pm
Not only did Ford survive but it thrives. Governments make bad bets on companies and technologies, just ask the Japanese. The government should be involved in basic and long term research, not propping up failing companies.
Now, we should not have allowed GM to go under. The auto industry and everyone who supplies it would have been in a world of hurt. And our economy at large would have been in a world of hurt as auto mftring is a substantial percentage of our economy. It just should have been done with loans rather than having the government own a piece of GM.
Don Niederfrank February 16, 2012 at 08:14 pm
What exactly IS the arrangement between GM and the gov't?
235301 February 16, 2012 at 08:18 pm
There are literally thousands of reasons for outsourcing work but the bottom line is almost every one of those reasons involve efficiency and what makes the best sense to get a job done. In the software industry offshoring is done, yes, for cost savings but there are also shortages of many types of talents(yes, there really are talent shortages in this country) and there is also a need for "follow the sun" development(where literally someone is working on a project/task 24 hrs a day because the company will have someone somewhere in the world working on it). There are also needs to move manufacturing closer to the customer. Our own auto industry has benefited from that as the need to reduce delivery times and shipping costs have moved some manufacturing here rather than overseas. There are also needs to understand the local markets that can't be acquired be having someone here in the US making those decisions.
Companies these days have to compete at a global level, no matter their size. That means they have to be leaner and more efficient than the competition. Companies have found that a mix of outsourcing and internal talent gets the job done. If they didn't outsource they likely would not have long term viability. Think of it this way: outsourcing/offshoring is saving jobs that would otherwise be lost had the company gone completely under had they not become leaner and more competitive.
Mark Czerniec February 16, 2012 at 09:56 pm
James: So in your imagination, Obama appointed a car czar?
CowDung February 16, 2012 at 10:04 pm
The Obama administration 'Car Czars' are/were Ron Bloom, Steven Rattner and/or Ed Montgomery according to my 'imagination'...
Craig February 16, 2012 at 10:10 pm
Imagine that: A Car Czar
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/22/house-votes-to-end-car-czars-tenure/
Mark Czerniec February 16, 2012 at 10:20 pm
And as the article points out, "czar" is invented journalist slang, not an actual thing. Ron Bloom was one member of the Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry, and not even one of its co-chairs.
Craig February 16, 2012 at 10:50 pm
Spud or potato it is the same damn thing.
Mark Czerniec February 16, 2012 at 11:00 pm
Fine -- then George W. Bush had an AIDS czar, a bioethics czar, a bird flu czar, a birth control czar, a copyright czar, a communications czar, a foreign aid czar, a democracy czar, a cyber security czar, a domestic policy czar, a drug czar, a faith-based czar, a health IT czar, a homeland security czar, a manufacturing czar, a mine safety czar, a food safety czar, a public diplomacy czar, a reading czar, a regulatory czar, a policy czar, a science czar, a counterterrorism czar, and a weatherization czar, among other czars.
What's the point? Is it better to have no one in charge of specific projects?
CowDung February 17, 2012 at 03:01 pm
According to this, Obama has appointed 38 czars so far. It seems to be a pretty well accepted term...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._executive_branch_czars
Mark Czerniec February 17, 2012 at 03:32 pm
But what is the issue? Does it prove Obama was born in Russia? Are there too many czars, not enough divas? Should there not be people who are responsible for particular missions of an administration? Bush had 30-some czars, Obama has 30-some czars -- why is it suddenly a controversy now?
CowDung February 17, 2012 at 03:38 pm
I think the point of it was that Obama has appointed a guy to run the car companies in a 'quasi-nationalized' fashion...
Mark Czerniec February 17, 2012 at 03:54 pm
But actually no, it was not just a guy. The original "czar" plan came from the Bush administration which approved the original bailout. The Obama administration abandoned the "czar" idea and went with a task force -- and yes, it's splitting hairs to differentiate between one person making decisions or several. The reality is that decisions have to be made by someone. These automakers, calling their own shots, were about to go bankrupt. Now that taxpayer money was being used to keep them alive, it's only natural that taxpayers should have a voice in the course corrections. It's not like Obama used tanks to take the companies over. They came to Bush broke. We would have no auto industry today without that bailout.
Mark Czerniec February 17, 2012 at 04:09 pm
“You could have written off this company, this industry, and this country.” -- GM CEO Dan Akerson
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7399030n
Daniel Lafond February 17, 2012 at 07:38 pm
well said , the GOP have know new ideas , they just what to take us back to the same old same old that did not work then and will not work in the future , it will take 10 years to fix what bush has done , you can not give out tax breaks when your in the middle of 2 wars , that is what drove up the def. you never here 1 tbagger complain about that do ya . Obama 2012
Daniel Lafond February 17, 2012 at 07:59 pm
he is not taking credt for it he is just stating that we need to do more of this , you cant be that much of a fool to understand this right , you just want to hate , thats fine just let us fix all the problems and you keep hating
Daniel Lafond February 17, 2012 at 08:02 pm
wrong , we have lost jobs for 6 months now under walker , he will be gone soon enough
CowDung February 17, 2012 at 09:15 pm
If I recall correctly, the car companies still went through bankruptcy after the government bailout, just as they would have without government intervention...
morninmist February 19, 2012 at 01:37 pm
Thanks John. Spot on!
John Nichols: Walker made right call by not appearing with Obama at Master Lock ......A Republican National Committee line holds that the economic upturn of the moment has been created by Republican governors. But Walker can't make that claim. He's stuck suggesting that job losses in Wisconsin are the fault of Obama and the Democratic president's policies. That is, of course, a fantasy. But Walker can maintain it when Obama is not around, and when the media is not looking at the fact of how Wisconsin trails neighboring states when it comes to actual job creation. Standing next to Barack Obama at Master Lock would have exposed Scott Walker's false premises, and his false statements. So, suddenly, the governor wasn't feeling well. Yes, he was up for a photo opportunity at the airport. And, yes, he was strong enough to put out a series of "I," "I," "I" statements regarding Obama's visit — including one in which Walker claimed credit for making things happen with the Wisconsin companies Obama mentioned. But Walker avoided the factory floor. The governor likes the limelight, and he wanted to grab the glory that goes with a presidential visit. But he did not want the scrutiny. http://host.madison.com/ct/news/opinion/column/john_nichols/john-nichols-walker-made-right-call-by-not-appearing-with/article_8cc4743c-58a4-11e1-80b8-0019bb2963f4.html?mode=story
Drive To 24 February 19, 2012 at 01:52 pm
Yes and he suddenly got better the next day. The truth is he's running from reality. He can't handle the truth.
Drive To 24 February 19, 2012 at 01:55 pm
Hoffa: same old lies and distortion. It ain't working with your talking points. Give it up man.
Drive To 24 February 19, 2012 at 02:02 pm
Yep- JUST YOU- so sad your party has conceded the presidency.
morninmist February 19, 2012 at 04:21 pm
How can anybody be supportive of a Governor who LIES all the time??
Coffee Bean @CoffeeBean26 Gov Walker claims on state owned website balanced deficit reforms.wi.gov/docview.asp?do… NOT TRUE: bloggingblue.com/2012/01/18/doa… #wiunion #wiriseup #wirecall http://bloggingblue.com/2012/01/18/doa-secretary-mike-huebsch-wisconsin-has-budget-deficits-for-fiscal-years-2012-2013/ By Zach W On January 18, 2012 DOA Secretary Mike Huebsch: Wisconsin has budget deficits for fiscal years 2012 & 2013 Have you heard those new TV ads Republican Gov. Scott Walker is running touting how he eliminated Wisconsin’s budget deficits? Don’t believe a word Walker says, because Department of Administration Secretary Mike Huebsch has the truth, which is that Wisconsin has projected budget deficits for fiscal years 2012 and 2013. What’s more, if we use Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to take a look at Gov. Walker’s first biennial budget (as Walker himself promised to do as a candidate), we’d have budget deficits in the billions of dollars....
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
kate June 5, 2013 at 04:17 pm
Grow up. We won't forget either. That those of you who had a little bit, held tightfisted to it likeRead More a four year old unwilling to share his toy truck. That you endorsed and supported a man who has gone on to undermine this state, its jobs, its infrastructure, its education system, its people, its very foundation. You remember...it was you who did this.
Steve ® June 5, 2013 at 04:53 pm
The temper tantrum continues one year later.....Thanks for the example Kate